Press Conferences

We went to California for my Father-in-law’s memorial service last week.  It is possible to miss people and yet have the joy of knowing God is still running the Universe!   
May your Thanksgiving be blessed with God’s presence!


When you’re thinking about your blessings this Thanksgiving, remember to thank God that we have a great Country with a great Constitution.  We just need to use the Constitution more.  There are some reasons to be concerned about the latest judicial ruling concerning a press pass.

The Executive branch of government has a right to make rules.  The purpose of the press conference is to dispense information to the reporters!  There’s no law requiring the Executive to host press conferences at all, much less who can be invited.

When I was in office, I could decide if I wanted to talk to reporters and select which ones.  For reporters, information is critical.  Without access to the White House, reporters have no news to report.  A press briefing benefits the journalists.  For the journalists, no new facts means there is no new story.

It’s not a “Town Hall” meeting.  It’s not the local water hole.  It’s not a focus group to understand opposing philosophies.  It is not your high school debate club!

If Acosta — OR ANY REPORTER — speaks out of turn or is rude, the White-house has the right to ask him to leave and not come back, especially if he refuses to relinquish the microphone.  Freedom of speech and freedom of the press — some of the rights articulated in the First Amendment, gives the reporters a right to print anything they want to print.  It does not give reporters the right to a taxpayer-funded microphone! 

If the story had ended with the reporter losing his press pass, we would have little to discuss.  I thought it was laughable that a reporter sued the White-house — up until the judge sided with the reporter.  We now have serious Constitutional concerns.

1.)  CNN had access to the briefing because it could have sent other reporters  —-  ones with better manners.  50 of them have press passes just from CNN!!!  This incident was not directed at CNN.  It was directed to the one individual who was unruly.

2.)  The judge who restored the press pass was appointed by Donald Trump.  This teaches us that even judges appointed by Republicans cannot be trusted to limit their branch and may attempt to legislate from the bench.

3.)  The judicial branch of government cannot tell the Executive branch how to run itself.  Therefore, the executive branch could rightfully disregard this judge’s ruling.  When the judicial branch tries to make itself the strongest branch of government, we must remember — it is not superior to the other branches!  We must consciously work to contain it or it will overtake the other two branches.

When I was in the House of Representatives, the doormen had the power to remove anyone from the Chambers for disorderly conduct.  The reporter was being disorderly.  Judge Kelly based his ruling on the fifth amendment of the Constitution, not the First Amendment.  Among other protections, the Fifth Amendment states that people cannot be denied their life, liberty or property without due process.  The reporter was not denied any of these, so this is not a Constitutional issue.  Where’s the due process for the unborn?

Some reporters wish they were celebrities.  If being belligerent can achieve fame, he got what he wanted out of it.  The tone of his questions did not reflect a desire to understand facts.  He was attempting to shame the White House for its public policies.  The lines have become blurred between news articles and editorials.  Wouldn’t it be great if reporters received their satisfaction from reporting news instead of trying to make the news!

Do you watch the White-House press conferences?  If so, what are your ideas for restoring decorum to the process?
Comment Button



1.)  Read the Constitution so you will be knowledgeable and capable of calling a foul when you see one.  The only way I knew the judge was wrong was because I read the Fifth Amendment.  The Constitution was not designed to be so difficult that only lawyers could understand it.  It was designed to be so simple that everyone can understand it.  Holding people accountable to the truth is our only recourse.

2.)  Listen to our show. Share our newsletter and this podcast with someone who may need it.   You can hear our show here.

3.)  The Home Front newsletter and podcast continues. Your involvement to fund our ongoing efforts, research and equipment will make a difference. If you want to continue to support us in this effort, you can mail a check to this address:

Cynthia Davis
840 Satinwood Place
Crestwood, MO 63126


On our show today we talk about what happens when life hands us lemons.  Jason Hague, author of Aching Joy, is a pastor and blogger from Western Oregon.  He comes to us to share how to understand some of life’s more perplexing problems.  Click here to listen.

Click here to listen to this informative podcast, or subscribe on:

iTunes / Google Play / More Options



  • Arthur LeBeau, Jr.

    I agree completely with you on this Cynthia. Reporters n eed to learn respect and especially the ones reporting what occurred , they make out Acosta as the “good” guy. I am sure The Donald (POTUS) has something “up his sleeve” to make this matter more understandable to those who don’t pay attention. I ask the Lord Jesus to bless President Trump each day as I am sure almost all of the readers on this site do also. Thank you Jesus for giving “The Donald” wisdom, Amen

    • Cynthia

      Thank you for your reply. Yes, we need to pray for our leaders. They have to go up against discouragement, disparaging people and evil every day from all sides.

  • Dan J

    Agree totally. Ironically, the judge doesn’t hold press conferences, doesn’t allow cameras, has no written ‘rules of decorum’ available for inspection, and certainly would not allow his courtroom to be hijacked by someone speaking out of turn. To me, this is just another example of why the judiciary MUST be restrained; cakes, catering, pizzas, press conferences…d’ya think the Framers intended the judiciary to meddle in every day transactions between a “free” people?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *